Liability for non-pecuniary damage remains a controversial topic in tort law and in particular whether non-pecuniary damages should be awarded to victims. This article by Worrawong Atcharawonghai, Judge of Phuket Provincial Court and Thai Barrister at Law, analyses the difference between the law of non-pecuniary damages in Thailand and in the US and considers applying the concept of the US non-pecuniary damages based system to Thailand where it is not really recognised. In Thailand non-pecuniary damages are granted only for some injuries, namely personal injury and loss of liberty. Although each US state may be different, many states collectively define non-pecuniary damages as compensation for pain and suffering. In the US, the jury system determines damages in non-pecuniary trials. The article concludes that Thailand should consider reforming its present position on Tort law to broaden the court's discretion in awarding damages, especially in cases where pain and suffering was incurred prior to death. |